影评书写格式怎么写简单又好看_影评书写格式怎么写简单又好看

1.高中编导怎么写影评

2.电视影评怎么写

3.艺术生考影评，应该怎样写?具体格式是什么?

评论过程通过结合影片具体内容和影片在构思、结构、技术、人物等方面最为闪亮之处摆出自己的观点，从而近一步论证。

**评论的可评之处，可以就其导演的独特构思、声音画面、蕴含的深刻道理、影片的时代意义、音乐、**内容、**灯光照明、**的拍摄技巧、**中的角色、影片的剪辑技巧、道具的作用、转场流畅度等都可以进行评论。

例：《秋收起义》一片多数文章都认为这部影片反映了秋收起义历史，成功地刻画了的形象，将与中国革命实践相结合，走农村包围城市的道路，为中国革命找到了斗争方向。

而根据列宁关于领袖的论述和中央关于思想的界定中认识到，影片反映了作为一个杰出的革命领袖在斗争中成长的历程，也揭示了思想形成与发展的历史原因与过程，从这一新的视角展开评论。

扩展资料

**评论的内容是多样的。有着重评论影片的题材、主题、人物或它的社会意义，也有专门论述不同片种、样式或影片的艺术风格、造型表现手段和**语言的运用的；有对某一时期、某一流派的**创作进行专题评论的，也有为著名的**导演、演员等**艺术家撰写评论的。

既有在报刊上对当时上映的影片或某种创作问题写专栏评论的，也有对一定时期和范围内的影片进行评论的。由于读者和观众的欣赏境界或文化背景不同，所以既需要供**专业工作者研究用的专题论文，也需要有提高一般观众欣赏水平的影评文章。

高中编导怎么写影评

　 《阿甘正传》（中英文对照）

　阿甘有自己的坚持，他不断地跑步，JUST RUNS. 他跑步不为任何理由。他说:"人要往前看，千万不要被过去拖累。我想我跑步就是这个意义”和过去告别，不停留在原处。也许这世界上太多人随拨逐流，很少人会坚持做一件事，阿甘坚持自己的坚持，于是他成了“神”。影片中还有一位主要人物是上校丹。他在越南战争中失去了双腿。他说他的命运就是战死。然而阿甘却救他，让他活了下来。失去双腿后他开始憎恨生活，生活得很颓废，责怪阿甘当初救了他。然而当他调整心态，去和阿甘一起生活，有了收获后，开始感觉到生活的美好。感谢阿甘当初就了他。影片试图通过这个角色告诉观者生活总是美好的。乌云后有彩虹，绝境后有重生。关键是看我们给不给自己一个好心态，一个机会去改变不好的现状。影片试图向观者传达这样一个信息：或许做好我们该做的每一件事，生活就会给我们一个好的.回馈。只要有一种坚持就会出现一个奇迹。

　Mr. A Gan has his own perseverance, keeping on running without of any reason, JUST RUNS.He said: “Man has t look forward, and never encumbered by foretime. I thank that's the meaning of my running.” Say goodbye to for foretime and don't stay in-place. Although so many people in the world are used to follow others and few people can stick to one thing, Mr. A Gan does and becomes “GOD”. There is another character Captain Dan. Dan lost his legs in Vietnarm War. He said that his fate is death in war. However, Mr. A Gan sed him and let him be alive. After losing legs, Dan was decadent and disgusted with life, complaining that A Gan shouldn't se him. When he adjusted his mind, living on fishing with A Gan, he started to enjoy the wonderful life and thank A Gan's help. The movie is intended to tell people that life is wonderful by this character. Rainbow is always after cloud. The key point is that whether we he a good mind and an opportunity to ourselves to change bad situation. The movie is also sent such a message to us: do well what we should do, and life will return us well. There will be a miracle if only there is perseverance.

　 Ice Age 冰河世纪 英语影评

　It’s not particularly surprising to be disointed by any computer-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo. In fact, until Shrek, 2001’s rollicking success, I wouldn’t he even believed it could hen. What is surprising, is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights, arently content to revel in its status a Monster’s, Inc.'s second rate, half wit cousin.

　Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie, one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs, pterodactyl eggs, and sympathetic cemen. This time, it’s the ice age, and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man. Strangely enough, in this early world, animals can talk, and humans cannot. But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby, wooly mammoth (Ray Romano), saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary), and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home.

　Visually, Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I he ever seen. Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters, Inc.; or even the gooey, gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters. No hint of photo-realism here. It’s like comparing a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King. Actually, I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for.

　Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and Leguizamo one liners. Some of them are even quite funny. If that is all that we’re going for here, then I suppose I’m all for it. But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching siness, which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation. Frankly, I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the

　task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters. The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living, breathing, creatures. It’s laughable watching their polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt, soft touches.

　Thankfully, the main characters are animals, which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels. As a result, what slapstick there is, is highly entertaining. Sure, Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular. But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation.

　The story itself is bland, boring, and uninspired, as is the almost laughably bad animation. The film’s only real sing graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct melon-hoarding dodos. Ice Age’s comedy is worthy of Bugs, but unless you’re under 5, you’ll be bored with everything else.

　 《冒牌天神2》观后感:

　This should've gone straight to video. Evan Almighty was not able to manage the expectations of those who came to see it anticipating as riotous a ride as its predecessor Bruce Almighty. It retained the premise of the original as a spin-off but it doesn't work not because Steve Carell is less talented than Jim Carrey but because he had lousy material to work with. Even Morgan Freeman (who reprises his role as God) lost the zing and impressive qualities he had in the first installment.

　Evan Almighty arently targets a family audience with its decidedly more religious overtones (check out what ARK really means), so it shouldn't he attempted to fool the audience by maintaining the Almighty franchise because it doesn't fit; its brand of humor and story simply failed to keep up.

　It would've probably done better if it were marketed differently instead of lazily riding on the success of Bruce Almighty when it painfully couldn't deliver the same punches.

　 这是<猫鼠游戏>的英语影评.对Frank 和Carl之间关系的评论

　It’s correct to describe Carl as a cat, also Frank as a mouse. Not only because the process that the cat chased the mouse day and night, but also Carl was as mild as a cat, not as violent as a tiger.

　Carl is only a clerk in FBI. He sticked to the regulations but didn’t lose his compassion. Years of detective work let him lose his lovely daughter, but didn’t make him ruthless. Though Carl was teased by the clever mouse several times, he still did not treat Frank as a criminal. He regarded Frank as a little boy, who should be lead on the right way.

　The brilliant mouse, Frank endured too much heartbreak in his childhood. Father’s bankruptcy, parents’ divorce drove him to go astray. He deceived every person he met. But at the Christmas Eve, Frank told the truth to Carl on the phone. He was so lonely at that time. Even though he was a great con man, don’t forget, Frank was still a ager who was interested in the comic books. He needs family. He needs love. All the fraud he made was aim at repairing his family.

　Then, when the two people who both had broken family were involved with each other, a new relationship was founded.

　Carl wasn’t as handsome as Frank Sr. He did not he little tricks such as “the lost necklace”. But he reciated Frank’s genius and taked a long time to rescue Frank. He knew he would try in vain to do it. But he still loved Frank, and treated Frank as his own child.

　It was incredible that a cat would love a mouse. But Carl did it.

　Fortunately, Frank ge up evil and returned to good with Carl’s help.

　Although I think it was sad that Frank was also a clerk in FBI at last. It wouldn’t be exciting for our audience. But after years of crazy, Frank needed to live like a common person, just as his hy childhood in France.

　Remember, Frank’s peace life should be attributed to Carl, who was clement enough. It’s Carl that makes the film full of love. Perhaps the relationship between them should be called “The cat father and the mouse son”.

电视影评怎么写

你好 我是大二的一名编导学生哈，影评其实就相当于议论文，但是你议论的是这部影片，与观后感不一样，重点不是感，是论，你要来评价这部影片。下面是在网上复制的，希望对你有帮助哈。正确的写法，应该按照议论文的一般框架，既有论点、论证、结论三大部分。

开头是提出问题，即论点部分。它应该包含两层意思。一是对分析的对象（即这部作品）做个简单的介绍：叫什么名字（标题），作者是谁（那个台拍的），属什么体裁（栏目），讲了什么内容，表达什么主题等。二是对这部作品做个总的评价，即提出全文的中心论点，如“这部片子拍得很成功”等等。

中间是主体，是提出问题，既论证部分。它要求具体分析这部片子的成功之处，有哪些创作经验。建议至少讲三个方面的邮电（或特点），而且每个方面分别写一小段，每个方面应该提炼出一句评语（即小论点）。小论点应该精辟、整齐、醒目，最好归纳的句式比较整齐。为了突出小论点，应该把它们放在各小段的开头，或改成粗题字排版，或省为小标题。还可在前面加上“第一、第二、第三”，或“首先、其次、再次”，或用排比句。这之后，在围绕这个小论点作分析，“摆事实、讲道理”。应该结合片子的内容，举出具体例子，夹叙夹议，边叙述有关情节或镜头，边分析他们的表达效果，以证明自己观点的正确性。这里要防止两种倾向，一是光叙述内容，变成讲故事了；二是光发议论，或空洞抒情，没结合具体内容，与作品完全脱节，空对空，那也不行。请注意，这一部分是文章的主体，决定了文章水平的高低，篇幅要站全文的绝大部分，短了不行。

最后是结尾，是解决问题，即结论部分。这部分很短，主要对全文作总结，或指出其不足，或提出希望，或补充说明，或照应开头。有了这部分，文章就有头有尾，完整无缺，并形成一个高潮，给人留下深刻的印象。

这是论文的常规写法，当然可以灵活掌握，不要把“框架”当成“框框”，束缚了思路。但就中学生而言，一般按这个格式去写较为妥当。建议先写好段落提纲，至少要想好要讲哪几层意思，然后按照提纲，一段一段写来。这样，论文的框架就很稳，就可以做大段落清楚，层次分明，小论点突出。（格式）

内容就是影片的内容，从影片的导演，主演，情节，叙述节奏，人物设置这些是大的虚的方面，还有就是镜头画面，比如用光，镜头运动，场面调度，色调，配乐，台词，等等。这些你不一定都要涉及到，要根据影片的特色来挑几点重点写。

比如

艺术生考影评，应该怎样写?具体格式是什么?

你好

评论分为两种，分别是**评论和电视评论

1.**评论（一般在500—2000字左右，格式如下）

（1）题目（自拟）

（2）副标题，格式“——评**《 》的------”

“-------”中填写你要评论的方向，一般有：主题，人物（指出是哪个人物，可以不是主角，但形象要立体丰满），视听语言（评视或者听，不能全评）等。

（3）第一段简要叙述影片内容，三四行为宜。

（4）第一论点+论据

（5）第二论点+论据

（6）第三轮点+论据（影评的论点依照字数来定，但一般不超过三个，论点写在每一段的开头，论据切记不可以复述影片内容，否则就是以述代评）

（7）结尾，升华

2.电视评论（一般在800字左右）

（1）题目（自拟）

（2）副标题，格式“评----《 》的（ ）”

“----”中写你所看的电视片的类型，如纪录片，宣传片，新闻片，专题片。“（）”中写你所要评论的方向，一般有社会人文价值：引导，教育，记录，审美等。编导意图，视听语言创意，结构，主持人等。“

（3）总述

（4）论点+论据

（5）论点+论据（论点多少依规定字数来定）

（6）结尾，升华

如有不明白的地方，请继续提问

一、思想评论: 1．评主题。力求有独到见解，深入挖掘. 2．评现实意义。也与主题有关，但更侧重于现实作用,现实题材的影片如评《离开雷锋的日子》,重在新时期学雷锋的积极意义. 3．写观后感。要联系现实，融进自我，或是褒扬先进，批语落后，针贬时弊；或是进行自我观照，寻找差距，激励鞭策.中小学生的影评文章多属此类。要注意的一是不能写成故事简介＋自我对照，二是要紧扣影片，而不是从影片中抽出一个话题，离开对影片的评论. 二、人物评论。这是较为普遍的评论样式，可分为单一人物评论、同一类人物评论、不同人物的对比评论 ,在人物评论写作中，最好力求不仅评析人物形象的意义，而且要结合人物塑造的方法，把握人物独有的个性，如人物特有的行为、动作、理想、志趣、才干，从中更深地挖掘出人物形象意义 三、美学评论（样式、风格、审美特性等）:1．艺术样式评论。如结合喜剧样式对影片《甲方乙方》展开评论! 2．艺术风格评论。如通过影片《大转折》中几个主要战斗场面的不同诗意内涵的分析，对该片以泼墨的方式抒发的浓郁的诗情，给人以震颤心弦的视听感受。对于引起较大争议的《红色恋人》则从**风格和创新的角度给予肯定。 3．审美特性评论。《对亲情与人伦的呼唤》从当代悲剧审美特性入手，指出当代悲剧重在探索人类精神生活的复杂性，唤起人们对人生有价值的东西枣亲情与人伦的珍视。评《小鬼当家》要结合儿童审美心理去分析! 四、**特性的评论。 <br /> 这类评论写作具有较强的专业性，如对**的语言、结构、修辞、悬念、音响、色彩、音乐、摄影、特技、表演、导演等方面的评论。 1. **语言评论. 2. **结构评论. 3. **修辞评论。**修辞包括多种手法，如对比、夸张、象征、拟人等! 4. **节奏评论. 5. **悬念评论. 6. **音响评论.＜大高高挂＞中的音响! 7. **色彩评论。如张艺谋的色彩运用! 8. **细节评论. 9. **表演评论。 10.**音乐评论。 以上评论角度不是绝对的，而是相互渗透、交叉、兼容的。评论的视角可以是复合的，如评论人物，除了上述的评一个人，评一类人，或对立人物的对照分析，也可以就几部影片或某一类影片中同类人物进行综合分析，或对某种创作倾向进行评论。**评论的文体样式可以多种多样，一般以论文体为主，也可以用书信体、对活体、问答体、随感录。近年也有散文体，散文体多以抒发情感为主，轻灵活泼、文笔优美，但一般缺少严密的论证，较少逻辑力量，理论色彩较单薄，在影评百花园中应当允许各种文体样式存在。 四、影评写作要求 : 1. 紧扣**与评论. 所评论的内容必须是影片提供的，而不能从说明书和报刊故事中寻找。 要抓住**艺术的特质，评论的对象有画面感、运动感。让没有看过**的人也能获得对影片的大致了解，认同你的观点! 要展开评论，明确中心，严密地进行说理与论证，切忌故事加感想或有观点而无论证! 2. 总体把握，细部突破。 首先对一部影片有正确的总体评价，在此基础选择一个较小的视角深入挖掘，做到高屋建瓴，品鉴入微。避免面面俱到，人云亦云。 另一方面避免一叶障目，不见树林。力求写出鞭辟入里的专论，不要写泛论、散论。目前各类报刊包括专业**报刊为了抢时效，搞炒作，发表的大多是新闻记者根据编导散发的资料摘编的综合评介，陷入故事情节＋主题思想＋艺术特色＋演员介绍＋拍摄花絮公式。 3. 思想性与艺术性的统一。 侧重于社会意义的评论要注意兼顾影片的艺术性，要用影片提供的银幕形象进行说明与论证。有一学生写《火烧圆明园》的影评，只是对这一历史抒发感慨，全文与影片毫无关系，严格讲这样的文章不是影评。 侧重于艺术价值的评论要把握艺术表现中体现的思想内. 要讲究评论文章自身的艺术性。 4. 注重思辩、讲究文。 力求有自己独到的见解，力求新颖、深刻，宁可是深刻的片面、伟大的偏见，创造性的误解，不要趋同，说一些都明白的正确观点构思立意如同兵家谋略,见日月不为明目，闻雷霆不为耳聪,出其不意，攻其不备，以奇制胜。注意评论语言的生动活泼、形象鲜明，注意句式长短得当、音韵和谐，既要有理论色彩，又要明白晓畅，让理论文章给人语言美感与动情力量。 评论角度 一、评主题：1、抗日斗争，揭露日寇罪行，歌颂人民不屈精神、博大胸怀、崇高人性；2、生命价值与民族命运；3、对和平和期呼唤与社会的发展的期望；4、在人类之爱基础上不同文化观念的撞击与交融。 二、人物评论：1、单一人物；2、某类人物；3、对比性人物；4、从人物关系评析，如中外、父女、民族与宗族等关系入手。 三、场景细节：几次争论；手榴弹的出现；小刀的运用；几个人物对死的选择；照片的作用。 四、悬念设置：人物命运为主线，将人物经常处于生死关头，环环紧扣。 五、矛盾冲突：1、进步与、民族解放与法西斯专制；2、东西方观念；3、宗族。 六、叙事线索：三种时态，现在时着眼于战争与和平的对比，调节情绪、深化主题，给作者一个自由的叙述时空；过去时表现矛盾冲突与情节发展的主线；过去完成时重点在揭露日寇罪恶。 七、情节与节奏：战斗高潮与抒情段落的设置；紧张与舒缓情绪的起伏；镜头节奏快与慢的转换。 八、中外影片比较：与《拯救大兵雷恩》相比，同是以回忆形式讲述拯救生命与回归家园，但《黄河绝恋》避开为什么救人的争论，避免说教，容纳更多内涵；多种矛盾冲突；群像式人物各有鲜明个性；战争与爱情两条线索推进，更富有抒彩。 九、与《红河谷》比较：文明冲突的合理性；叙事特色强化故事性；人物塑造在对比中展现性格的发展，注意人物性格的丰富性。